Intel Core 2 Duo E4500 Vga Drivers

admin
  1. Intel Core 2 Duo E4500 Graphics Drivers

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

In terms of overall gaming performance, the Intel Core 2 Duo E4400 2.0GHz is noticeably better than the AMD Athlon II X2 240 when it comes to running the latest games. /download-ms-office-2007-activation-wizard-crack.html. The E8600 is the most powerful Core 2 Duo in the E series, however it's only a few MHz different from an E8500 3.33 vs 3.16 respectively, hence you'll receive the same. Install Package: Intel® Embedded Media and Graphics Driver (build# 3070) v36.18.4 MR4 (maintenance release 4) for Windows. Embedded Compact 2013. Driver: Windows CE. v36.18.4 Latest: 2/26/2016: Intel® Graphics Driver for Windows® 7 & 8.1. 15.40 6th Gen This download installs the Intel® Graphics Driver for 6th Gen. Driver: Windows 10, 64-bit.

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
Intel

Intel Core2 Duo E4500

Reasons to consider the
IntelCore2 Duo E4500

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache2 MBvs0.5 MB4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core1 MB/corevs0.25 MB/core4x more l2 cache per core
Much higher Maximum operating temperature73.3 °Cvs65.3 °CMore than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature

Reasons to consider the
IntelCore i3 3220

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed3.3 GHzvs2.2 GHzAround 50% higher clock speed
Much newer manufacturing process22 nmvs65 nmA newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPUYesvsNoSomewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much better PassMark score4,229vs1,275More than 3.2x better PassMark score
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score5,351vs1,988Around 2.8x better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score
More threads4vs2Twice as many threads
Has virtualization supportYesvsNoSomewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air)3.43 GHzvs3.16 GHzAround 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Lower typical power consumption44.69Wvs52.81WMore than 15% lower typical power consumption
NewerSep, 2012vsJul, 2007Release date over 5 years later
Lower annual home energy cost13.25 $/yearvs15.66 $/yearMore than 15% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost48.18 $/yearvs56.94 $/yearMore than 15% lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Duo E4500 vs Core i3 3220

E4500

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core)Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core)Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core)Data courtesy Primate Labs

summary

Core2 Duo E4500 vs Core i3 3220
Clock speed 2.2 GHz 3.3 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 775
LGA 1155

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 65W 55W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 13.25 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 48.18 $/year
Performance per watt 1.38 pt/W 2.69 pt/W
Typical power consumption 52.81W 44.69W

Intel Core 2 Duo E4500 Graphics Drivers

details

Core2 Duo E4500 vs Core i3 3220
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 2 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 11 33
Operating temperature Unknown - 73.3°C Unknown - 65.3°C

overclocking

Overclock popularity 9 50
Overclocked clock speed 3.16 GHz 3.43 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.52 GHz 3.46 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.16 GHz 3.43 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 2500
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,050 MHz

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1